Point Source Carbon Capture (2024)

Advancing technologies for the capture of CO2 from point sources, such as natural gas power and industrial facilities, with minimum cost and energy penalty

The U.S. Department of Energy/National Energy Technology Laboratory’s (DOE/NETL) Point Source Carbon Capture Program is developing the next generation of advanced carbon dioxide (CO2) capture concepts to support the United States in achieving ambitious goals for a greenhouse gas (GHG)-neutral economy by 2050, a carbon-pollution-free power sector by 2035, and a 50% reduction from 2005 levels in economy-wide net GHG pollution by 2030. DOE’s Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management (FECM) has adopted a comprehensive, multi-pronged approach for carbon management that involves the coupling of carbon capture methods (i.e., Point Source Capture (PSC) for fossil fuel-based power generation and industrial sources; and carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies co-located with low-carbon energy sources) with long-duration carbon storage or CO2 utilization/conversion into long-lasting products. The PSCC Program is accelerating commercially deployable solutions that can be applied to a wide spectrum of CO2 emissions sources, including facilities that produce power, hydrogen, ethanol, cement, or steel. Projects range from conceptual engineering and materials design at laboratory and bench scale (Technology Readiness Level [TRL] 2-5) to large-scale testing and front-end engineering and design (FEED) studies (TRL 6-7) to lower both capital and operating costs and improve the economics of PSC.

Carbon Capture Newsletter

Carbon Capture Proceedings

Carbon Capture Project Map

Carbon Capture Compendium

The Point Source Carbon Capture Program is advancing technologies to minimize the environmental impacts of fossil fuel-based power generation and to decarbonize existing infrastructure in the power and industrial sectors. Research and development (R&D) efforts to date have led to reductions in both capital and operating costs through implementation of energy and process efficiencies and development of advanced CO2 capture media (e.g., solvents, sorbents, and membranes). To achieve deep decarbonization of emissions sources, the program is focused on developing highly efficient, scalable carbon capture technologies with even further cost reductions, that are capable of operation under a flexible duty cycle, and that can achieve greater than 95% carbon capture.

Key Analysis Areas

Point Source Carbon Capture (5)

Solvents

Solvent-based CO2 capture involves chemical or physical absorption of CO2 from a gas into a liquid carrier. R&D of advanced solvents (e.g., water-lean solvents, phase-change solvents, high-performance functionalized solvents) that have a lower regeneration energy requirement than existing amine systems, combined with high CO2 absorption capacity and tolerance to impurities, is a key objective for lowering capture costs. System advancements include process intensification techniques, methods to mitigate aerosol formation and corrosion, and heat integration approaches.

Point Source Carbon Capture (6)

Sorbents

Sorbent-based CO2 capture involves the chemical or physical adsorption of CO2 from a gas using a solid sorbent. R&D objectives include low-cost durable sorbents that have high selectivity for CO2, high CO2 adsorption capacity, resistance to oxidation, and can withstand multiple regeneration cycles with minimal attrition. System advancements include sorbent process intensification techniques, novel reactor designs, and enhanced process configurations, such as rotating beds for CO2 adsorption and desorption.

Point Source Carbon Capture (7)

Membranes

Membrane-based CO2 capture uses permeable or semi-permeable materials that allow for the selective transport and separation of CO2 from a gas. Membrane processes offer potential advantages when compared to other CO2 separation technologies, including no hazardous chemical storage, handling, disposal, or emissions issues; simple passive operation; tolerance to high sulfur oxide [SOX] and nitrogen oxide [NOX] content; a reduced plant footprint; and efficient partial CO2 capture. R&D objectives include development of low-cost, durable membranes (e.g., polymeric membranes, mixed matrix membranes, sub-ambient temperature membranes) that have improved permeability and selectivity for CO2, thermal and physical stability, and tolerance to gas contaminants. Process enhancements for membrane-based capture systems include low-pressure drop membrane modules.

Point Source Carbon Capture (8)

Novel Concepts

Novel concepts include alternative technologies and processes, such as cryogenic separation and electrochemical membranes, and additive manufacturing of novel system components and materials. R&D objectives include development of equipment, materials, and processes that enable intensified thermodynamic operations, improve process performance, and reduce equipment size, lowering capital and operating costs.

Point Source Carbon Capture (9)

Hybrid

Hybrid systems efficiently combine two key technologies in a single system (e.g., sorbent-membrane system). Hybrid concepts can reduce the overall energy intake of the process by leveraging process synergies, resulting in a more cost-effective system.

Point Source Carbon Capture (10)

Enabling Technologies

Enabling technologies are concepts that could improve a whole class of materials, and although the research might be applied to one specific material, it is envisioned that substantial research findings could benefit multiple materials. R&D topics include solvent aerosol emissions mitigation, solvent viscosity reduction, solvent stability improvements, materials compatibility, corrosion resistance improvements, and degradation products reduction or separation.

Point Source Carbon Capture (11)

Point Source Carbon Capture (12)

Point Source Carbon Capture (13)

Point Source Carbon Capture (14)

Point Source Carbon Capture (15)

Point Source Carbon Capture (16)

Point Source Carbon Capture (17)

DOE To Invest $30 Million in Carbon Conversion and Highly Efficient CO2 Capture Technologies
FOA000-2614: CARBON MANAGEMENT: Funding will support the Nation’s commitment to using carbon emissions as a feedstock for value-added products and developing lower-cost, highly efficient technologies for point source CO2 capture.

Request for Information: DE-FOA-0003263-Industrial Deployment and Demonstration Opportunities for Carbon Capture Technologies
RFI seeking input to assist DOE in the planning of priorities and initiatives to catalyze the development, demonstration, and deployment of carbon capture, conversion, and storage technologies to decarbonize America’s industrial sectors.

DOE Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations (OCED) Selects Four Projects as Part of theCarbon Capture Large-Scale Pilot Projects Program
DOE OCED announced up to $304 million in funding for four projects—in KY, MS, TX, and WY—as part of the Carbon Capture Large-Scale Pilot Projects Program, which supports projects that implement carbon capture technologies at the pilot scale across the power and industrial sectors.

DOE Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations (OCED) selects three projects as part of the Carbon Capture Demonstration Projects Program
DOE OCED announced up to $890 million in funding for three projects — in CA, ND, and TX — as part of the Carbon Capture Demonstration Projects Program, which aims to advance integrated carbon capture, transport, and storage technologies and infrastructure that can be deployed at power plants and in hard-to-decarbonize heavy industries.

DOE/FECM issued NOI DE-FOA-0003232 for DE-FOA-0002614 titled Carbon Management (Round 5)
Proposed Areas of Interest for Round 5 of DE-FOA-0002614 include R&D on technologies that utilize CO2 from point sources such as power/industrial flue gas and direct air capture to produce value-added products and the development of enabling technologies that support demonstration of carbon capture systems installed at electric generation or industrial facilities.

News: 2023 FECM / NETL Carbon Management Research Project Review Meeting Proceedings Posted
The proceeding from the 2023 FECM / NETL Carbon Management Research Project Review Meeting held August 28 - September 1, 2023 are posted for the following programs: Point Source Carbon Capture, Carbon Dioxide Removal, Carbon Conversion, and Carbon Transport & Storage.

DOE/FECM Project Selections for Funding Opportunity Announcement 2614: Carbon Management (Round 3)
$45.6 million in federal funding announced for nine projects that will advance carbon dioxide (CO2) capture technologiesand help build a foundation for a successful carbon transport and storage industry in the United States.

Point Source Carbon Capture (18)Point Source Carbon Capture (19)

Explore the Site

News Stories

CCSI2

Project Information

Systems Analysis

Infographics

Publications

Accomplishments

Point Source Carbon Capture (2024)

FAQs

What is point of source carbon capture? ›

CO2 emissions in our atmosphere is like water overflowing a bathtub. Point source carbon capture is turning off the tap, catching the CO2 emissions at the source (e.g., a chimney) before it enters into the atmosphere to cause warming.

What are the downsides of CCS? ›

Disadvantages of Carbon Capture and Storage – Cons
  • High Cost. CCS costs vary greatly depending on the concentration of CO2, type of technology and industry. ...
  • Varying Effectiveness. The efficiency of carbon capture projects is not consistent across the board. ...
  • Prolonging the Energy Transition.
Mar 8, 2023

Does carbon capture actually work? ›

A recent study found that after taking into account the energy used to capture and isolate CO2 from flue gas at a fossil fuel-burning industrial plant, the carbon capture system would reduce the plant's net emissions by only 10 to 11 percent, not the estimated 80 to 90 percent cited by proponents.

Why is carbon capture so difficult? ›

Decarbonization is incredibly difficult in industrial sectors like power generation and manufacturing due to the massive amounts of energy required to keep facilities running.

What is the difference between point source carbon capture and DAC? ›

Direct air capture (DAC) technologies extract CO2 directly from the atmosphere at any location, unlike carbon capture which is generally carried out at the point of emissions, such as a steel plant. The CO2 can be permanently stored in deep geological formations or used for a variety of applications.

How big is the point source carbon capture market? ›

The global market for Carbon Capture was estimated to be worth USD 4.41 Billion in 2023 and is forecast to a readjusted size of USD 6.89 Billion by 2030 with a CAGR of 6.6% during the forecast period 2024-2030.

Why does CCS not work? ›

CCS projects increase the energy demand of the facility they capture carbon from by 15%–25% on average, which stands to increase emissions given that the energy used to capture CO2 is often natural gas-powered electricity. In general, the technology is highly energy inefficient and generates its own emissions.

What can go wrong with carbon capture? ›

Other Related Risks

In this formula, CO2 can be corrosive impacting pipelines used to transport CO2 to storage sites. Then there's also the possibility that the pressure of CO2 injections could have small seismic effects or tremors, depending on the geological formation, making site selection that much more critical.

What are the criticism of CCS? ›

The scientific viability of long-term CO2 storage remains dubious, with concerns of leaks looming large. The inevitability of leaks renders this technology not just risky but a potential hazard, threatening lives and local environments.

What is the biggest obstacle to CCS? ›

Key carbon capture and storage challenges include cost, technical difficulties, safety, storage capacity, and regulatory requirements. Public perception can also be an issue, with critics raising concerns about its safety and effectiveness.

Is 100% carbon capture possible? ›

CCS technologies have significant potential to reduce CO₂ emissions in energy systems. Facilities with CCS can capture almost all of the CO₂ they produce (some currently capture 90 or even 100 percent).

What is the success rate of carbon capture? ›

Extracting CO2 from air is possible, although the lower concentration of CO2 in air compared to combustion sources complicates the engineering and makes the process therefore more expensive. The net storage efficiency of carbon capture projects is maximally 6–56%. About two thirds of CCS cost is attributed to capture.

Why is CCS so expensive? ›

The persistent high costs of CCS are attributed to high design complexity and the need for customization that limits the deployment of CCS.

What are the disadvantages of CCS? ›

High Costs. One of the major drawbacks of CCS is that is still has a relatively high cost. The technology requires significant investments in research, development, and infrastructure, which can be prohibitively expensive. Thus, research neeeds to be further developed to help reduce such costs.

How does CCS make money? ›

The main financial incentives to use CCS are revenues from enhanced oil recovery and a federal tax credit for capturing and storing CO2.

What is the main idea of carbon capture? ›

CCS involves capturing carbon dioxide (CO2) at emission sources, transporting and then storing or burying it in a suitable deep, underground location. CCS can also mean the removal of CO2 directly or indirectly from the atmosphere.

What is the purpose of carbon source? ›

A carbon source is a carbon-containing molecule that is used by an organism to synthesise biomass. Such sources may be organic or inorganic. Heterotrophs must use organic molecules as a source of both carbon and energy.

What is the benefit of carbon capture? ›

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a way of reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, which could be key to helping to tackle global warming.

What is point of emission capture? ›

Point-source capture is when a large emission source, like an industrial facility, is equipped with technology allowing the capture and diversion to storage of CO2, preventing it from being emitted.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Delena Feil

Last Updated:

Views: 5869

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (65 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Delena Feil

Birthday: 1998-08-29

Address: 747 Lubowitz Run, Sidmouth, HI 90646-5543

Phone: +99513241752844

Job: Design Supervisor

Hobby: Digital arts, Lacemaking, Air sports, Running, Scouting, Shooting, Puzzles

Introduction: My name is Delena Feil, I am a clean, splendid, calm, fancy, jolly, bright, faithful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.